PCT AND
THE BIBLE
PCT is
said to be a theory founded in the belief that human beings are organized to
self-control.
There are six definitions for the word “theory” listed on http://www.m-w.com/, Merriam-Webster OnLine.
1: the analysis of a set of facts
in their relation to one another;
2: abstract thought: SPECULATION;
3: the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art <music theory>;
4a: a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action <her method is based on the
theory
that all children want to learn>
4b: an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances -- often used in the phrase in theory <in
theory, we have always advocated freedom for all>;
5: a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena
<wave theory of light>;
6a: a hypothesis assumed for the
sake of argument or investigation;
6b: an unproved assumption:
CONJECTURE
6c: a body of theorems presenting
a concise systematic view of a subject <theory of equations>.
Take your choice on how you want to define PCT as a theory. Would you choose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6? I would choose none of the above, because
PCT is not a theory. It is a principle
of life decreed by God the Father in eternity past and revealed as such in Holy
Scripture. It can be said, then, that
perceptual control is the belief that man was created by God to control
himself. He is designed to self-control
rather that control by someone else. If
this is so, and it is, self-control can only be self-control if one is in
control of his own life. If
self-control in a person’s life is really self-control, then self-control in
that person’s life cannot be labeled as such if anyone or anything else is in
control of that person’s life.
Self-control must mean self-control.
Self-control implies freedom of choice. It does not determine the nature of a
person’s choices, good or bad, right or wrong.
It determines only that an individual is free to choose. If anyone or anything limits a person’s
choices to either good or bad, right or wrong, then that is no longer free to
choose and self-control has been relinquished to another source.
God has created man to control himself, free to choose right
or wrong, good or bad. The term
volition will be used to denote freedom of choice. It is one of man’s five soul characteristics: self-consciousness, mentality, volition,
emotion, and conscience. It is
sometimes referred to as the decider of the soul. Volition has a positive pole and a negative
pole. The positive pole is used to make
choices that are deemed to be right or good.
The negative pole is used to make choices that are deemed to be wrong or
bad. The fact that right and wrong, good
and bad are relative terms in the minds of some, remember that this book
acknowledges absolutes. This
implies that whatever constitutes God’s truth in any dispensation of time, good
and bad, right and wrong are distinguished from one another by comparing them
against God’s divinely revealed standard.
To force man into right choices destroys the very nature of
volition. To deny man wrong choices
also destroys the very nature of volition.
If volition is tampered with in any way, freedom of choice as man’s
God-given right to self-control is destroyed.
Man’s God-given right to self-control is first evidenced in
the Garden of Eden when the divine prohibition was introduced in Genesis
2:16-17 “And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the
garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou
shalt surely die.” Properly translated
from Hebrew in to English, the latter part of this verse should read, “ . . .
dying thou shalt die.” The word “dying”
refers to spiritual death which is defined as separation from God in time, not
eternity, but in time, that is, separation while physically alive. The phrase “shalt die” is a reference to
physical death.
With this divine prohibition, man was given
choices—obedience or disobedience. So,
under the principle of self-control, man chose disobedience and suffered the
immediate consequence of spiritual death which is tantamount to separation from
God in time, that is, while he is physically alive.
The word “whosover” is used 183 times in 163 verses in the
King James Version of the Bible. Each
“whosoever” recognizes a person’s prerogative to control his own destiny
through personal choices. This is tantamount
to self-control.
The language of the New Testament is basically Koine Greek,
and there are four conditional uses of the word “if” in the Greek
language. The first class condition
says, “If, and it’s true.” The second
class condition says, “If, and it’s not true.”
The fourth class condition says, “If, I wish it were true, but it’s
not.” The third class condition says,
“If, maybe you will, and maybe you won’t.”
This third class condition recognizes the God-given right of
self-control. Man rightfully says, “I’m
in control. I’ll decide whether I will
or won’t. I’m the captain of my own
ship.”
As has been shown in this chapter, the Bible confirms that
PCT is not a theory, but a fact, decreed by God in eternity past.
The
Computer of Divine Decrees
The computer of divine decrees is a term used to define and
describe the decrees of God in eternity past.
God doesn’t own a computer, but this analogy will assist in
understanding how God’s plan for the human race was designed and is being
carried out.
There are three Persons of the Godhead: God the Father, God the Son, and God the
Holy Spirit. While the three Persons of
the Godhead are co-equal and co-eternal, they each have different job
descriptions regarding a plan for the human race: the first Person of the Godhead known as God the Father authored
a plan. The second Person of the
Godhead known as God the Son has executes the Father’s plan, and the third
Person of the Godhead known as God the Holy Spirit is the revealer of the plan
to the human race and restores to the plan anything out of alignment with the
plan.
As the Author of the plan, God the Father decreed that plan
in eternity past while the only things in existence were the three Persons of
the Godhead. Using a computer analogy,
there are two sides to this computer:
the ROM chip side and the PROM chip side. The ROM chip is a “read only memory” chip programmed at the
factory and unalterable by the user, and in this sense, the ROM chip in the
computer of divine decrees is programmed by the sovereign will of God and
unalterable by any human being. The
PROM chip is a “programmable read-only memory” chip into which data can be
entered from the user outside the factory.
In this sense, God the Father as the master programmer, enters data into
the PROM chip, using His omniscience to do so.
Through omniscience, He observes human history and enters into the PROM
chip every decision made by every human being throughout all of human history. It makes no difference whether human
decisions are consistent with or contrary to His will. All decisions are entered into the PROM chip
of the computer of divine decrees.
At some time in eternity past when God the Father called for
the printout of human history, the printout came out of the computer just as it
was programmed, from both the ROM chip side and the PROM chip side; and because
there is a divine purpose for human history, God the Father has coordinated the
programs on both sides of the computer so as to accomplish His divine purpose
in human history, namely, the resolution of the spiritual battle referred to as
the angelic conflict.
Freedom of choice is the issue in resolving the angelic
conflict. Why freedom of choice? God the Father’s plan called for man to be
created lower than the angels. If man,
the lower creature, would choose obedience to the Creator’s plan, the
implication is that the higher creature, namely angels, one of which was
Lucifer Son of the Morning, later known as Satan, could have chosen obedience,
but didn’t, therefore, God the Father, as Creator of all things, is justified
in sending Satan to the Lake of Fire.
The Lake of Fire represents a location of eternal condemnation which is
eternal separation from the Living Creator God.
When God created man, namely, Adam in the Garden of Eden, He
created Adam a trichotomous being:
body, soul, and human spirit.
The human body places man in contact with the world outside himself. The human soul places man in contact with
himself, and the human spirit places man in contact with the Living God.
The human soul has essence or characteristics. The human soul is comprised of
self-consciousness, mentality, volition, emotion, and conscience. Self-consciousness makes him aware of his
own existence. The soul’s mentality is
comprised of two lobes, a left lobe and a right lobe. The left lobe is location wherein man is able to say, “I
understand.” The right lobe is the
location in which man stores all of his understanding that he has chosen to
believe. Volition is the decision-maker
of the soul. It has two poles, a
positive pole and a negative pole. With
the positive pole, man chooses those options in life that are consistent with
God’s plan. With the negative pole, man chooses those options in life that are
contrary to God’s plan. Emotion is the
appreciator of the soul, and it too, has two poles: a positive pole and a negative pole. From the positive pole man expresses such emotion as happiness
and joy. From the negative pole man
expresses such emotion as anger and bitterness. Conscience is the location in man’s soul where his standards are
stored, and his conscience is based upon whatever he accepts as true, without
regard to whether it is true or not.
Volition is the issue in the resolution of the angelic
conflict. It is an issue throughout the
entire Bible. Volition means freedom of
choice. Freedom of choice implies
self-control, and self-control is a basic tenet of the Perceptual Control
Theory (PCT). Since volition,
self-control, and freedom of choice have been decreed by God, and His decrees
are revealed in the inspired, infallible, inerrant Word of God, there should be
no doubt that the concept of PCT finds its source in the divine decrees. If these relationships can be confirmed, one
only needs to say, “CASE CLOSED.” PCT
is biblically based and the concept has been decreed by God from eternity past.
When man discovers a concept such as PCT, it can only be
stated that he has discovered the faithfulness of God as that faithfulness
relates to His divine decrees. The
concept is decreed whether discovered or not, but when discovery is made, man
must discovers what the Creator has decreed.
The principles associated with PCT will explain how we as human beings are always trying to achieve what we want by behaving in ways to change our perceptions to match our internal goals. It also shows how little we can know what is going on in the mind of another human being.
Consider the following principles associated with PCT, none of which transgress any Church Age principle, promise, doctrine, technique, or rule for living the Christian way of life.
Some Principles Associated with the Perceptual Control Concept
1. A human being does not choose his behavioral actions.
2. A human being controls his perceptions, not his behavioral actions.
3. A human being is aware of the perceptions he controls, but he may be unaware of the specific actions by which he
controls those perceptions.
4. When asked, “What are you doing?” a person usually describes the perception he is controlling, not his behavioral
action.
5. The person who asked the question thinks you are describing what you are doing (behavioral action).
6. A person can only see the behavioral actions being used by another person to control his perceptions.
7. Since one person may not know what is being perceived by another person, he sees only the behavioral actions being
used by the other person to control his perceptions.
8. While a person sees what another person is doing, he does not see what the other person is perceiving.
9. Principle: Don’t change a person’s behavioral actions by dealing with his behavioral actions; change a person’s
behavior by dealing with his perceptions.
10. Of all the perceptions one may be experiencing at any given moment, that person may only choose to control a few.
11. A person’s actions may produce unintended consequences.
12. One unintended consequence of a person’s behavioral action is the disturbance of another person’s perception.
13. A disturbance that disrupts an established function in any environment is referred to as a disruption.
14. A disruption is a behavioral action that disturbs a perception of another human being.
15. Behavioral actions are an attempt to correct the difference between what we WANT and how we PERCEIVE we are
doing in terms of getting what we WANT.
16. We do what we do to get what we want. Our perception tells us whether we have it or not.
17. When our perception tells us we don’t have what we want, we do whatever is necessary to get what we want, and we
will change what we are doing as often as necessary until our perception tells us we have what we want.
18. Point 17 implies three things: 1) a want; 2) a perception, and 3) a behavioral action.
· a want: what you are trying to achieve, obtain
· a perception: the way you view what you want
I have it
I don’t have it
I’m trying to get it
· a behavioral action:
doing nothing because I have what I want
continue doing what I did to get what I want so that I can hang-onto what I want
doing what I deem necessary to get what I want
doing what I deem necessary until I get what I want.